FigureAsia 35 Under 35 · AI
Aditi Raghunathan
Age 31 · Academic researcher · India and United States; foundational research released through international conferences
Redrawing the Limits of Reliable Model Learning
- Age at the edition eligibility date
- 31
- Field
- Reliable machine learning, adaptation and model memory
- Country or region
- India and United States; foundational research released through international conferences
- FigureAsia U35 Assessment
- 89.9 / 100
Profile
Career and documented record
At Carnegie Mellon, Aditi Raghunathan studies the hidden trade-offs inside modern language models: what they remember, what prolonged training can damage and how objective design constrains originality. Her work gives the field sharper tools for building systems that remain capable without becoming inscrutable.
Aditi Raghunathan works where capability, reliability and the mechanics of learning meet. An assistant professor in Carnegie Mellon University’s School of Computer Science, she asks questions that become more consequential as models grow: when does additional pretraining make adaptation harder; where is memorised information stored; and what do standard training objectives leave beyond reach? In 2025, her group contributed three unusually clear interventions. The ICML Outstanding Paper “Roll the Dice & Look Before You Leap” examined creative limits imposed by next-token prediction and argued for objectives that can explore beyond the distribution they inherit. “Overtrained Language Models Are Harder to Fine-Tune” reported that a one-billion-parameter OLMo checkpoint trained on three trillion tokens performed more than two points worse on several downstream benchmarks than an earlier 2.3-trillion-token checkpoint. “Memorization Sinks” isolated neurons associated with retained examples and reported near-perfect targeted unlearning after removing them. These are team results, with Raghunathan serving principally as a senior author. Together, they define her method: turn broad concerns about originality, adaptation and forgetting into mechanisms that can be tested, challenged and improved.
FigureAsia selection
Why Aditi Raghunathan is on the list
FigureAsia selected Raghunathan for making foundational questions operational. In a field often governed by scale and aggregate scores, she identifies mechanisms that determine whether a model remains adaptable, whether information can be removed and whether next-token learning narrows the range of possible ideas. The strength of the case lies in methodological clarity, an outstanding-paper distinction and a coherent programme spanning capability and control. Her results do not promise a finished safety solution; they establish tractable problems that other researchers can reproduce and extend.
Verified work
The 2025–26 record
Verified contribution 01
Senior author of the ICML 2025 Outstanding Paper Roll the Dice & Look Before You Leap, which used controlled algorithmic tasks to test the creative limits of next-token prediction.
Verified contribution 02
Senior author of Overtrained Language Models Are Harder to Fine-Tune; the study’s one-billion-parameter OLMo experiment found more than a two-point downstream deficit after three trillion rather than 2.3 trillion pretraining tokens.
Verified contribution 03
Senior author of Memorization Sinks, a proof-of-concept training method that isolates memorised sequences in designated neurons to permit targeted removal while preserving general performance in the reported experiments.
Field context
The work in its field
Her work addresses problems shared by every laboratory training or adapting large language models. Open research artefacts and publication at major international conferences give the findings relevance across academic, commercial and public-interest AI, independent of any single model family or market.
Educated at IIT Madras before completing her doctorate at Stanford, Raghunathan represents a research path connecting Indian technical education with frontier machine-learning scholarship.
FigureAsia U35 Assessment
Assessment breakdown
89.9out of 100
Defining contribution
22.5 / 25
A completed piece of work, institution or system that materially changes what the field can do.
Demonstrated impact and reach
17 / 20
Observable adoption, scientific use, policy consequence or operational reach, with self-reported metrics labelled as such.
Personal agency and attribution
13.5 / 15
Evidence that the individual shaped the result, separated from team, employer and investor halo.
Technical or institutional originality
14.1 / 15
A new method, product form, research direction, governance mechanism or deployment model.
Durability and field-shaping influence
9 / 10
The likelihood that the contribution will remain useful beyond a single news cycle or model release.
Evidence integrity and responsible practice
9.2 / 10
The quality of the record, the precision of claims and the seriousness with which limitations and harms are addressed.
Asia–world relevance
4.6 / 5
A documented connection to Asia, impact on Asian systems, or clear importance to the region’s place in the international field.