FigureAsia 35 Under 35 · AI
Akari Asai
Age 30 · Research scientist and incoming academic · Japan and United States; open research systems intended for worldwide scientific use
Building Open Systems for Evidence-Grounded Machine Intelligence
- Age at the edition eligibility date
- 30
- Field
- Open language models, retrieval and scientific research agents
- Country or region
- Japan and United States; open research systems intended for worldwide scientific use
- FigureAsia U35 Assessment
- 91.7 / 100
Profile
Career and documented record
Akari Asai has made openness a technical proposition rather than a slogan. Her research combines retrieval, reinforcement learning and transparent evaluation to help language models investigate scientific literature, conduct long-form research and know when the available evidence does not support an answer.
Akari Asai’s work is organised around a practical question: can advanced research systems be both useful and inspectable? Trained at the University of Tokyo and the University of Washington, she developed her recent programme across Washington and the Allen Institute for AI, and is due to join Carnegie Mellon University as an assistant professor in autumn 2026. She is first author of OpenScholar, published in Nature in February 2026, a retrieval-augmented system that searches a corpus of 45 million scientific papers before composing cited answers. On the project’s ScholarQABench evaluation, the open eight-billion-parameter model exceeded GPT-4o by 6.1 percentage points and PaperQA2 by 5.5 points for correctness; these are study-specific comparisons, not general capability claims. Asai also co-authored DR Tulu, which introduced reinforcement learning with evolving rubrics for open-ended deep research, and Binary Retrieval-Augmented Reward, which reported lower hallucination rates while preserving performance on instruction following, mathematics and code. The common thread is accountability: release the models, data and evaluation materials, then make evidence—not fluency—the standard against which an answer is judged.
FigureAsia selection
Why Akari Asai is on the list
FigureAsia selected Asai for joining frontier performance to an unusually complete commitment to reproducibility. OpenScholar supplies a model, corpus, benchmark and public code; DR Tulu extends open reinforcement learning to long-form research; Binary RAR addresses factuality without the broad capability losses reported for comparison methods. Her record is significant not because every benchmark result will generalise, but because other laboratories can inspect the recipe and test the claims. That combination of technical quality, scientific usefulness and open infrastructure is rare at any career stage.
Verified work
The 2025–26 record
Verified contribution 01
First author of OpenScholar, published in Nature in February 2026; the paper reports a 6.1-point correctness advantage over GPT-4o and 5.5 points over PaperQA2 on its multi-paper synthesis benchmark.
Verified contribution 02
Co-author of DR Tulu in 2025, which introduced Reinforcement Learning with Evolving Rubrics and released the model, training data, code and agent infrastructure for open-ended deep research.
Verified contribution 03
Co-author of Binary Retrieval-Augmented Reward in 2025, which reported a 39.3% hallucination reduction on open-ended generation and fewer incorrect answers on selected knowledge tasks without losses on the tested instruction-following, mathematics or coding tasks.
Field context
The work in its field
Scientific-literature overload is a global constraint. By publishing reusable models, datasets and evaluation tools, Asai’s teams enable researchers in institutions without frontier-scale budgets to examine, adapt and challenge systems for evidence-based synthesis across disciplines and countries.
Her route from undergraduate engineering in Tokyo to research leadership in the United States gives the region a direct intellectual stake in globally accessible scientific AI.
FigureAsia U35 Assessment
Assessment breakdown
91.7out of 100
Defining contribution
23.05 / 25
A completed piece of work, institution or system that materially changes what the field can do.
Demonstrated impact and reach
17.6 / 20
Observable adoption, scientific use, policy consequence or operational reach, with self-reported metrics labelled as such.
Personal agency and attribution
13.95 / 15
Evidence that the individual shaped the result, separated from team, employer and investor halo.
Technical or institutional originality
13.65 / 15
A new method, product form, research direction, governance mechanism or deployment model.
Durability and field-shaping influence
9.2 / 10
The likelihood that the contribution will remain useful beyond a single news cycle or model release.
Evidence integrity and responsible practice
9.5 / 10
The quality of the record, the precision of claims and the seriousness with which limitations and harms are addressed.
Asia–world relevance
4.75 / 5
A documented connection to Asia, impact on Asian systems, or clear importance to the region’s place in the international field.