FigureAsia 35 Under 35 · AI
Aparna Dhinakaran
Age 31 · Technical founder and product leader · India and United States; open observability infrastructure used across global developer ecosystems
Building the Evidence Layer Behind Reliable Artificial Intelligence
- Age at the edition eligibility date
- 31
- Field
- AI evaluation, observability and production reliability
- Country or region
- India and United States; open observability infrastructure used across global developer ecosystems
- FigureAsia U35 Assessment
- 91.5 / 100
Profile
Career and documented record
Where others compete on model scale, Aparna Dhinakaran has concentrated on what happens after deployment: tracing behaviour, evaluating failure and turning production evidence into better agent systems. Her work has helped make AI reliability an engineering discipline rather than a launch-day promise.
AI’s decisive battles are increasingly fought after a model ships: in traces, failure taxonomies, evaluator design and the difficult work of learning from production. Aparna Dhinakaran has made that operational layer her field. As co-founder and chief product officer of Arize AI, she has helped turn observability from a specialist discipline for predictive models into a working architecture for generative applications and agents. In 2025 she co-authored Prompt Learning, an approach that feeds natural-language critiques from evaluations and annotations back into system instructions. The company’s published tests reported a ten-percentage-point improvement on a selected Big-Bench Hard run, while keeping edits readable and reviewable rather than burying them in model weights. The same product year brought session- and trajectory-level evaluations, prompt optimisation, real-time tracing and 91 platform releases; the company reported 3.5 million monthly Python downloads for its open-source tooling and more than 567 billion ingested spans. By 2026, its open telemetry work was connecting production observability with framework-agnostic agent evaluation and controls. Dhinakaran’s contribution is not another model. It is the evidence layer that lets teams see, test and improve the systems models become.
FigureAsia selection
Why Aparna Dhinakaran is on the list
FigureAsia selected Dhinakaran because she has shaped the layer on which trustworthy deployment depends. Her work joins open instrumentation, production-scale observability, evaluator design and continuous improvement in one coherent practice. That combination has unusual leverage: it reaches beyond any single model or application and gives builders a common way to detect failure, compare interventions and preserve an audit trail. The record is strongest where product metrics and dated releases are concrete; the editorial claim is leadership of a field, not sole authorship of every engineering output.
Verified work
The 2025–26 record
Verified contribution 01
On 18 July 2025, co-authored the public Prompt Learning implementation, which uses natural-language evaluation feedback to revise system instructions. The company reported a ten-percentage-point improvement in a one-iteration Big-Bench Hard experiment and disclosed selected-test limitations.
Verified contribution 02
During 2025, under her product remit, the company shipped 91 releases, including session-level evaluation, agent-trajectory evaluation, prompt learning and real-time trace ingestion. Its year-end account reported 3.5 million monthly Python downloads, more than 567 billion ingested spans and over 387 million evaluations processed.
Verified contribution 03
On 2 June 2026, the company was named among launch partners building with and validating an open, framework-agnostic agent trust stack combining policy-driven evaluation with standardised runtime controls. This is company-level work, not sole technical authorship.
Field context
The work in its field
Phoenix’s open-source distribution, multi-framework integrations and millions of monthly downloads give the work reach far beyond one company or market. Open telemetry makes the underlying evidence portable across global developer ecosystems instead of binding reliability to a single model provider.
Vendor-neutral tracing and evaluation are especially consequential for Asia’s heterogeneous AI market, where teams routinely cross model providers, languages, clouds and regulatory regimes.
FigureAsia U35 Assessment
Assessment breakdown
91.5out of 100
Defining contribution
22.7 / 25
A completed piece of work, institution or system that materially changes what the field can do.
Demonstrated impact and reach
18.6 / 20
Observable adoption, scientific use, policy consequence or operational reach, with self-reported metrics labelled as such.
Personal agency and attribution
13.95 / 15
Evidence that the individual shaped the result, separated from team, employer and investor halo.
Technical or institutional originality
13.5 / 15
A new method, product form, research direction, governance mechanism or deployment model.
Durability and field-shaping influence
9.2 / 10
The likelihood that the contribution will remain useful beyond a single news cycle or model release.
Evidence integrity and responsible practice
8.8 / 10
The quality of the record, the precision of claims and the seriousness with which limitations and harms are addressed.
Asia–world relevance
4.75 / 5
A documented connection to Asia, impact on Asian systems, or clear importance to the region’s place in the international field.